Inland Marine Insurance
Chapter 10
Goods in transit

 


Over 150 years ago commercial transportation centered on the oceans and the ports that sent and received the goods. Obviously, those goods that ended up transported by ocean had to be transported to the ports for shipment. Inland marine insurance refers to the transportation over land. Primarily, the risks and coverage relate to goods in transit. Even so, risks have been added that have little or no transit characteristics.

 

 

Why is it called Inland Marine insurance?

 

Originally it was the custom to insure goods only while on a vessel. Water travel was the principal means of transportation so the demand was for coverage for those circumstances. As inland transportation became more common the need for insurance beyond the vessel also became in demand. The ocean policy was extended by endorsement to cover the goods while on dock. Then it was extended by endorsement to cover the goods while they were on connecting land and water conveyances until they reached their destination. The next step wasnt hard to make: adapt the ocean policy to cover inland transportation risks. They termed the policies Inland Marine Insurance.

 

Growth of the Inland Marine Insurance Industry

 

Inland marine insurance would not have developed had the inland transportation facilities not developed and improved. With each new improvement, new and varied transportation risks were recognized. These risks needed insurance. One of the major developments was the transportation of certain types of personal property, which the owners desired insurance for.

 

The first major inland transporter was the railroad. Initially, the railroad practiced self-insurance. This worked well in most cases, but as private industry began to ship large cargos, it became evident that self-insurance would no longer be the answer. Many private companies actually bought their own railroad cars and paid the railroad to move them. As this became more common the shippers realized that there were gaps in the railroads protection. They sought insurance as a result.

 

Next came private transportation: automobiles, trucks, and airplanes. Although they were not typically used in major transportation of goods they did have a value that was substantial. The possibility of loss, therefore, was also substantial to their owners. As private inland transportation became increasingly common, owners requested insurance policies to insure against loss.

 

Americans consider their economy as one of financial affluence. Our ability to spend on nonessential items has grown as our economy has grown. Of course we still have poverty, but America has less poverty to a less severe degree than nearly any other country. Even our poor have more dollars to spend than does the poor in most other countries. The result is an increase in personal property. Our personal property includes such things as jewelry and other high value items that require insurance against theft or other loss. Small items, such as jewelry and personal equipment (computers for example) present a high moral hazard because they are so easily sold. While kept at a residence such items are covered by homeowners insurance, which tend to be named-location and named-perils coverage. However, this coverage is not always adequate for the value needed and, in some cases, for the type of property owned. The need for broader coverage and off-premises protection may be considered by the inland marine insurer. Due to many reasons, including the need to adapt to new demands, some risks became better covered by marine rather than fire or casualty insurers. For those who are interested in a historical perspective, Franklin Tuttles Examination of Insurance Companies should be consulted.

 

Many states have laws that restrict the types of items and coverage that a fire and casualty company may insure. Typically the insurance lines that must be followed are life, fire, casualty, or marine. These limitations made some types of coverage more easily underwritten by marine insurers. The charters and state laws gave marine insurers the power to assume liability against loss or damage to property originating from the perils of transportation. Since there was no precise definition as to what constituted a transportation risk, an ambitious marine underwriter could interpret transportation risk any way he or she saw fit. There were few (if any) objections from the fire and casualty insurers who did not wish to take on the additional broad coverages. Additionally, marine insurers had expertise from the hazards of transportation that were unique. They were accustomed to writing policies that were designed for specific situations. These underwriters could zero in on specific circumstances in ways that the typical fire and casualty underwriter was not experienced in.

 

Fire and casualty underwriters were restricted from the kind of experience that marine underwriters were exposed to routinely. The strict regulation of the forms and rates used by fire and casualty insurers (as required by state regulation) also restricted their underwriting experiences. The regulations promoted rigidity rather than flexibility in the policies. Since marine underwriters had never experienced such restriction they were experienced in the flexibility required to venture into new forms of coverage. It is unlikely that marine insurance will ever experience such rigid control since they compete in an international market where competition requires the ability to be flexible. Competition is the nature of the marine market.

 

New types of coverage can be difficult to write effectively in the beginning. Marine insurers, in some cases, issued very broad policies covering all risks, with few exclusions. Policies were issued for warehouses and property that were never in transit. Items such as stained-glass windows, organs, high-tension lines, bridges, and tunnels were insured. Obviously, a bridge or tunnel will not be in transit.

 

As the marine underwriters wrote a growing number of policies that had nothing to do with transportation, fire and casualty insurers began to protest. They felt their field of insurance was being invaded. The conflict became so pronounced that in 1932 the Insurance Superintendent in New York held hearings and issued a ruling as to the powers each type of insurer had. The National Convention of Insurance Commissioners (today called The National Association of Insurance Commissioners) adopted the Nationwide Definition and Interpretation of the Insuring Powers of Marine and Transportation Underwriters in June 1933, which is referred to as the Nationwide Marine Definition. This definition has been revised in 1954, 1956, 1959, and 1976. The various underwriters have agreed to abide by its provisions. A Joint Committee on Interpretation and Complaint was established under the agreement. It consists of representatives of the marine, casualty, and fire underwriters. They have the power to execute and carry out the provisions of the wide marine definition, although any insurer may appeal a ruling or interpretation.

 

The Joint Committee on Interpretation and Complaint addresses questionable cases that come up and issues interpretive bulletins on questions that are submitted by insurers under the definition. The Nationwide Marine Definition has been modified periodically by individual states. This is not a definition in the normal sense. Rather, it is a listing of the types of policies and risks that the NAIC has identified as making up the field of marine insurance.[1] Primarily the purpose is to classify risks as either marine, inland marine, or transportation insurance. There is an abbreviated version of six divisions of coverage identified in the Nationwide Marine Definition:

 

1)         Imports. As long as the goods remain segregated and identifiable and have not been sold by the importer, removed from storage and placed on sale, or moved into a manufacturing or processing operation they are considered to be imports.

 

2)         Exports. From the time the goods are designated and being prepared for export, they are considered to be in this category.

 

3)         Domestic Shipments. This includes goods that are in transit, on consignment, or otherwise in the custody of others that are not the owner. Such shipments are not covered at the manufacturing premises nor after arrival at the premises owned, leased, or operated by the insured.

 

4)         Means of Communication. This includes bridges, tunnels, piers, pipelines, power transmission lines and towers, radio and television equipment, and towers and outdoor cranes. Specifically excluded are buildings, their improvements, furniture and fixtures, and supplies held in storage.

 

5)         Personal Property Floater Risks. This would include:

a.     Personal effects

b.     Personal property

c.      Government service

d.     Personal fur

e.     Personal jewelry

f.       Wedding presents

g.     Silverware

h.     Fine arts

i.        Stamp and coin collections

j.       Musical instruments, including radios, TVs, and record-type players that are not musical instruments

k.     Mobile machinery and equipment, excluding any items designed for highway use

l.        Installment sales and leased property, excluding any items designed for highway use

m.  Live animals

 

6)        Commercial Property Floater Risks. In addition to the transit risks concerned with imports, exports, domestic shipments, and qualified communication items, there are business risk floaters.

a.     Radium

b.     Physicians and surgeons instruments

c.      Patterns and dies

d.     Theatrical property that would travel with a troupe

e.     Film during production and on completed negatives and sound records

f.       Salesmens samples

g.     Exhibition property in transit and while on exhibit

h.     Live animals

i.        Builders and/or installation risks

j.       Mobile articles, machinery, and equipment, excluding motor vehicles designed for highway use

k.     Property in the custody of a bailee or in transit to or from bailment

l.        Installment sales and leased property excluding motor vehicles designed for highway use

m.  Garment contractors

n.     Furriers or fur storers of customers property

o.     Accounts receivable, valuable papers and records

p.     Floor plan merchandise held for sale by dealers under a plan of reimbursement

q.     Signs and street clocks

r.       Fine arts held or owned by other than individuals

s.      Dealers who sell personal property that may be covered specifically by floater policies after the sale.

t.       Wool growers

u.     Domestic bulk liquids including storage tanks

v.     Difference in conditions (DIC) coverage

w.   Electronic data-processing policies

 

The final section of the Nationwide Marine Definition identifies the exposures that do not qualify as marine risks unless specifically covered in the preceding sections.

 

         Storage of insureds merchandise

         Merchandise in the course of manufacture on the premises of the manufacturer

         Furniture and fixtures and improvements and betterments to buildings

         Monies and securities in safes, vaults, safety deposit vaults, banks or insureds premises, except while in the process of transportation

 

Inland Marine Insurance Characteristics

 

The Nationwide Marine Definition does not define inland marine insurance. Only the underwriting powers for the ocean and inland policies are described. The Nationwide Marine Definition is used to distinguish the powers of the marine and other types of insurers, but no dividing line between the ocean marine and inland marine insurance is given. The term, Inland Marine Insurance, while used by those in the business, actually has no stated meaning. While it is possible to state the inland marine insurance lines, it is difficult to define the subject in a definite manner that would exclude other lines of coverage. Why? It is the nature of inland marine insurance to cover a wide variety of risks. The chief characteristic of inland marine insurance is coverage of property inland during transit. Inland transit is transportation of property by means other than sea. That could include transportation by land, air, or even water (but not the ocean). This statement contains some important exceptions or modifications:

 

1.     Sometimes protection against the hazard of transportation by sea is made in inland marine policies. An example of this is the Jewelers Block policy.

2.     Usually the insured property is the cargo and not the actual transportation vehicle. Insurance policies on hulls used on lakes, rivers, and canals, and insurance policies covering other types of inland carriers, such as aircraft or trucks designed for highway use are not considered to be inland marine items for coverage. However, railroad rolling stock and off-the-road contractors equipment would qualify for inland marine coverage.

3.     Many policies cover the legal liability of the insured rather than direct damage to property. For example, in contracts issued to motor, railroad, and air carriers, the policy gives protection against legal liability for loss and damage caused by the perils insured against while the goods are in the possession of the carrier.

4.     Some policies may be issued to cover non-portable property, such as bridges or tunnels. Such items were considered an aid to transportation so this class of business was given to inland marine insurers. Additionally, fire and casualty insurers were originally unable to provide coverage for the perils these items faced.

5.     Coverage against the risks faced by property while it is stationary is also available under inland marine policies. These floater policies are common in the protection of portable property, both of the business and personal type. These floater policies were the first items that caused problems between other insurers and inland marine insurers.

 

A very important characteristic of inland marine insurance (perhaps the most important characteristic) is the willingness of this type of underwriter to venture into new and previously untried fields of insurance. Of course, it helps that marine underwriters are legally able to venture into new fields. The lack of regulatory restrictions and the past experience of marine underwriters in new areas created a unique ability to try new fields. Probably no single contribution, however, has been as significant as the development of all risks coverage by the marine and inland marine underwriters.[2]

 

 

All-risks protection

 

The development of all-risks coverage is a development that is relatively new. It came about when organized land transportation companies became a major mover of goods. These companies needed protection from the risks of land transportation. Besides needing coverage, they needed coverage in an amount that would protect the actual value of the goods. The types and quantities of the goods being moved required protection from a wider variety of risks than previously provided for. The all-risk policy was developed through recognition of these facts. The all-risk protection was necessary because a major loss is still a financial loss whether it results from fire, theft, or a gas leakage. This fact had already been recognized in the ocean marine business. It took longer to be recognized for goods transported across land.

 

Since marine underwriters had vast experience underwriting transportation of goods, it made sense that they would underwrite land transportation, too. It is important to remember, however, that although there is all-risk protection available for inland marine policies, that does not necessarily mean all policies are written as such. There are many inland marine policies that cover only specified perils named in the policy.

 

Both an inland marine policy and a fire policy could be written on either a specified peril basis or an all-risk basis. When written on a named peril basis, each peril is specifically named. If it is not named, it probably is not covered. Under an all-risk policy, protection is provided against all fortuitous causes of loss subject to any exceptions specially stated in the policy. Even when named peril policies seem broad (because so many perils are named), it is impossible to compare it to an all-risk policy. It is the nature of things to have hazards that were not anticipated. Why would the insured go with a named peril policy when an all-risk policy gives better protection against loss? Because a named peril policy is less expensive than the broader all-risk policy premium.

 

All-risk policies do not all have the same wording. Older policies state that they cover against all risks of direct physical loss, or all risks of loss or damage to the insured property except as hereinafter provided. More recent policies may state they cover external risks of direct physical loss unless the loss is limited or caused by a peril that is excluded. Whatever the wording, the courts have held that the all-risks type of policy covers only those losses that are direct rather than consequential, fortuitous, and accidental in nature. Losses intentionally caused by the insured would not be covered.

 

No policy covers everything. Even all-risk policies have exclusions. The exact exclusions will be listed in the policy. Exclusions are used to clarify coverage, eliminate risks that cannot be insured against based on reasonable rates, or to reduce the likelihood of carelessness on the part of the insured.

 

 

Excessive hazard

Excessive hazards are typically excluded from coverage. An excessive hazard may be, for example, property that is on exhibition exposing it to a large number of people. This peril may be able to be covered for additional premium. Some hazards, such as war, cannot be covered even for extra premium.

 

 

Property normally covered by other insurance

It is not unusual for property to be covered under more than one policy. When it would be normal for the risk to be covered by another policy, it may be excluded under an inland marine all-risk contract. An example of this would be an automobile that would typically be covered under a separate policy specifically designed for this purpose.

 

 

Wear and tear

Most items have routine use that causes wear and tear. Such routine use is typically excluded from policies. Otherwise, consumers would never have to personally replace anything as it ages. Normal use that produces the natural aging (and wear and tear) of an item is not considered normal coverage for a policy. A related type of loss arising out of inherent vice is also excluded. Inherent vice is loss due to the natural quality of the item. For example, food will spoil normally as it ages even if no actual damage has occurred. Some contracts also exclude loss due to insects and vermin. The terms may not be specific, but typically it includes moths, and rats. There has been some debate as to whether or not squirrels are included in the exclusion.

 

 

Dampness or extremes of temperature

Exclusions for dampness and temperature extremes are likely to be found in floaters that deal with property that is susceptible to such things. This is very similar to the wear and tear exclusions.

 

 

Carelessness of the insured

A major cause of loss is carelessness. As a result, some policies exclude loss due to policyholder carelessness. Language may differ, but often refers to marring and scratching of fragile articles. Any loss that is within the control of the insured may be excluded. The number of claims filed may also determine whether or not carelessness is considered by the company.

 

 

Carelessness of others

When insured items are being worked on by others, underwriters do not want to be insuring their actions. Therefore, loss or damage that is the result of the item being worked on (whether employees of the insured or not) may be excluded. This exclusion is related to moral hazard. If it is the job of employees to work on equipment, there is likely to be a policy in place for that specific purpose.

 

 

Mysterious disappearance

One of the major risks faced by businesses today is the disappearance of property with no provable reason. The moral hazard this represents is too great to be insurable. There are floaters that cover theft, but they require evidence or at least a strong presumption that theft has occurred.

 

 

Infidelity (a disloyal act)

We like to believe that honesty is a trademark of business. As Enron demonstrated, this is not always the case. Insurers are not interested in duplicating the coverage of fidelity bonds or assuming the moral hazard where there is misappropriation, secretion, infidelity, or any dishonest act on the part of the insured . . . his employees . . . or others to whom the property may be entrusted (carrier for hire excepted).

 

 

Artificially generated electricity

Those who have a generator or some other devise for generating electricity may find that their policy does not cover loss as a result. Usually, it applies only to electrical apparatus and does not exclude coverage for fire that may ensue.

 

 

Earthquake and flood

Earthquakes and flood perils are excluded with respect to property at the premises of the insured. There are policies that may be purchased that would cover such loss. Inland marine policies may also offer floaters to provide this coverage.

 

 

War, acts of war, and nuclear reaction

It may seem unlikely that one would be applying for compensation following an act of war. However, in these times of terrorism there is the possibility that an act of war, even in peacetime, can happen. The intent is to avoid the catastrophe hazard. With the changing times, it has been necessary to expand the traditional definition of warlike actions.

 

 

Underwriting

Moral and Morale Hazards

The types of property that inland marine policies cover are susceptible to theft because it is mobile, hard to identify, and readily convertible to cash. In addition, the goods often have a high value. The owner, if financially stressed or simply dishonest, can submit a claim for theft and still sell the merchandise. Even an honest policyholder, if careless in protecting the goods, may end up submitting a claim when the goods are genuinely stolen. This leads to high premiums and selective underwriting.

 

 

Assignment

Insurance companies recognize the importance of the person purchasing the insurance. While the property being insured is certainly a major focus so, too, is the person purchasing it. Because underwriters consider the buyer when issuing a contract, they tend to prohibit assignment of the policy to another without their consent. When their consent is requested for assignment, the company will consider whom the policy is being assigned to before granting permission. The underwriter will be considering the moral hazard that might be present.

 

 

Who is requesting coverage?

 

Those insured will be presented in the same order found in the Nationwide Marine Definition. Risks vary so greatly depending upon the subject that there is no particular order necessary anyway. Some inland marine contracts will be standardized, whereas others are literally written to meet the specific needs of a particular insured.

 

 

Imports and exports (categories A and B)

As we have previously discussed, this relates to the ocean marine policy. Inland marine policies merely adapted the ocean marine policies for their use with the warehouse-to warehouse clause.

 

 

Domestic shipments (category C)

As the name implies, this relates to domestic shipments. The property transportation begins and ends within the United States. That doesnt mean that all these policies are the same. Since the interests and goods may be vastly different, the policies governing them may be vastly different as well.

 

The coverage of domestic shipments is separated into two main groups. First there is the exposure to loss by the ones who have an interest in the goods themselves. This is the shipper. Second, there is the exposure of loss for one carrying the goods of another. That would be the liability of loss of someone elses goods while in the carriers care. This is the carrier.

 

The shipper has several choices:

 

         He may transport the goods on owned or leased equipment himself.

         He may place his goods in the care of a common carrier.

         Or, he may place the goods in the care of a contract carrier.

 

Of the owner (shipper) uses railroad or truck common carriers, then under English common law, the carrier is generally responsible for the safe delivery of the goods. There are exceptions. If the loss results from acts of God, acts of the public enemy, exercise of public authority, fault or neglect on the part of the shipper, or inherent vice or nature of the property then the carrier is not at fault and is not, therefore, liable. This is different than carrier by sea, whether domestic or overseas, where they are not responsible for loss to cargo simply if free of negligence.

 

Responsibility of air carriers falls between the land and the sea carriers, being greater than that of the sea carriers and less than that of the land carriers.

 

The liability of a contract carrier depends upon the terms of their contract. When the contract does not address the subject of liability, then the carrier is usually only considered liable if there is negligence.

 

What is a common carrier? A common carrier is one that holds itself out to serve all who want to use their services, provided its equipment is suitable for the goods being shipped. Typically common carriers operate on established routes on an established schedule. Contract carriers reserve the right to choose the shippers they serve and to go where the shipper directs.

 

When there is a loss, how is payment for that loss determined? There is the right of the carrier to limit the dollar amount of recovery. If a straight bill of lading is used then the carrier will be liable for the full value of the damaged goods. The tariff, which is the charge for carrying the goods, will be higher than if a release bill of lading is used. Under a release bill of lading the amount that can be recovered is limited. Since the tariff might be substantially higher under a straight bill of lading, the second type is often used.

 

Even though the common carrier may have liability for the goods being transported, it is often beneficial for the owner of the goods to carry insurance of their own. This is often considered because the loss of goods due to some peril that would not be covered by the shipper must be recognized. In addition, the shipper may be given the release bill of lading which would not cover the true value of the goods. Finally, in the event of loss, the shipper would receive immediate compensation from his or her personal policy and through subrogation gives the insurer the opportunity to seek satisfaction from the carrier. Even though a court may find the carrier liable to the shipper, whether or not the shipper could collect damages is always uncertain.

 

 

Transportation policies

Transportation policies may also be referred to as transit policies. Transit policies are considered vital to shippers since they cover the shippers interests only. They are usually of the open or floater type (the word open is used in the same sense as it was in connection with ocean marine cargo policies). In other words, it is written on a time basis and automatically covers all shipments of goods of the kind described in the policy. In open policies the values of all shipments are reported to the insurer and periodically the premium is determined based on the values of the goods shipped since the last adjustment. There are no rate filings for most transit policies since there are no standard policies. Rates and coverage will depend upon the past loss experience of the insured, the type of cargo being transported, the frequency of the shipments, the value of the shipments, where the goods are going to and coming from, plus anything else that might influence the possibility of loss. This would include how the goods will be stored before and during the delivery and how the goods will be handled (even how many times they will be handled) by the insured. The insurance normally applies in the United States from the time the goods leave the premises of the insured until they reach their destination.

 

Protection is available on either a specified-perils or on an all-risks basis. As we stated, all-risks is more expensive, but also more comprehensive. Under specified perils coverage, protection is typically listed as:

 

1.     While on land against loss or damage by fire, lightning, cyclone, tornado, flood; collision, derailment, and overturning of a vehicle; and other perils inherent in the act of transportation.

2.     While waterborne, against loss or damage caused by fire and perils of the sea, including general average and/or salvage charges and expenses, but free of particular average unless amounting to 3 percent of the value of each case or package.

3.     Against theft of an entire shipping package only, but does not include pilferage.[3]

 

The all-risks (broad form) extends the coverage to include all risks of loss or damage from any external cause. Both types of coverage will list exceptions to the protection purchased. Some types of property will not be insured at all, including such things as accounts, bills, currency and goods carried on deck. This stated list is not inclusive. There can be other types of goods not covered besides those listed here.

 

Some types of hazards are not covered, such as acts of war (whether declared or not). Generally loss determined to be caused by neglect will not be covered. Most merchandise being transported via public carriers are written on an all risk policy.

 

Policies will have conditions in them. Conditions relate to multiple things including any other insurance that might be primary, misrepresentation when applying for either the insurance or for a covered loss, fraud, notice of loss, damage to labels on insured goods, plus anything else that might apply to the particular types of goods being transported. Some of the conditions will be adaptations from fire and ocean marine policies. Others will be specifically designed for the individual policy based on individual traits of the transaction.

 

 

Parcel Post and registered mail policies

When an agent drops new business into the mail, he or she usually insures the package (we hope). This is done as a protection against loss or theft if it includes any type of monetary document and as a way of tracing the package if it becomes misdirected.

 

Parcel post and registered mail policies cover the shipments by specified transportation companies. Each type of mail is specific so each policy will be specific as well, although there will be similarities. Depending upon the mail piece, carriers will use airlines, railroads, trucks, and other forms of transportation that may be specific to the carrier. This might even include individuals who are contracted to make the final leg of the mail delivery journey.

 

Parcel post insurance is available to those who ship often by parcel post and who do not want to deal with insuring each piece of mail individually with the U.S. Postal Service. Coverage is written using an open form that requires the insured to keep a record of shipments and to report them periodically to the insurer. An estimated premium is typically deposited in advance. The premium may be adjusted as necessary to keep up with the mail shipped. The quoted rate per $100 of value shipped is applied to the reported values to arrive at the final premium.[4]

 

Packages and mail is insured while in transit by parcel post, whether registered or not, from the time the property passes into the custody of the Postal Service for transmission until arrival at the stipulated address within the limits of the continental United States, Canada, and Alaska. Although there are some exceptions, the coverage is for all risks of loss or damage from any external cause. Goods that easily deteriorate are only protected against fire, theft, pilferage, and non-delivery. There is also an exemption from loss when the package or goods have been wrongly addressed or the address is not complete. This would even include the omission of a suite or apartment number. There is also no coverage against loss if the package is not properly packaged or wrapped. Obviously, there would be no coverage if sufficient postage has not been paid. Coverage may also be excluded if the package is not marked Return Postage Guaranteed. In addition, some items are not insured, such as currency, bills or deeds. They may be able to be insured under a separate coverage. Liability for any one package shipped by ordinary parcel post is limited to $100 per package unless additional insurance has specifically been purchased. The limit is $50 for any one package shipped by registered mail or government-insured parcel post.

 

 

Registered mail policy

The Registered Mail policy is typically used to insure transfer of securities, bullion, jewelry, precious stones, coins, currency, checks, money orders, postage, or other types of goods that have a specific value that need specific handling. This type of mail is shipped by registered mail and/or express (including registered air mail and/or air express) within and between places in North America and/or places in North America to places anywhere in the world and vice versa. This offers protection that exceeds that offered by most other shippers. Shipments may be reported on a daily, monthly or annual basis.

 

All risks are covered under a registered mail policy, except for war and nuclear energy. Coverage is in place while the mail is between the premises of the sender and addressee or until returned if delivery is not possible.

 

Like all policies, there are conditions. Some are adaptations from fire and marine policies. Others are particular to the type of policy this is. Due to the content value of many of these packages, there may be the condition that the contents be verified by two persons. Wrapping may also be required to meet certain criteria. Liability to the insurer is typically limited to certain amounts depending upon the type of property shipped. These limits may be quite high. Securities, for example, may be as high as $5,000,000 or more.

 

 

First class mail policy

Even first class mail can be insured. It is a special form covering shipments handled by the Postal Service. This policy and certified mail coverage were designed to supplement coverage for the insureds holding registered mail policies.

 

This type of coverage is issued to banks, bankers, trust companies, investment firms, security brokers, and others who transfer security issues. The policy covers all risks on shipments of bonds, coupons, stock certificates, and other securities. The only exclusion is war and nuclear energy. It should be noted that no coverage is provided on any U.S. government securities or coupons thereof.

 

Certified mail coverage may be an endorsement on the first class mail policy, which then covers another form of shipment that is handled by the Postal Service.

 

 

Other forms

Armored car and messenger policy

Just as postal services find insurance necessary, so does messenger services and armored car services. Their policies are similar to the registered mail policies in that they cover types of merchandise that need special handling. The merchandise would include such things as precious metals, currency, and other items that would be difficult, perhaps even impossible to replace. Coverage is from the time of acceptance to the delivery point. If delivery is not possible, the policy would also cover the return to the shipper. The policy is all-risk with exceptions for war, nuclear energy and theft by the shipper or the consignee.

 

 

Motor truck cargo insurance

As we know, trucks move large amounts of American goods across the country. Obviously, they would purchase insurance for their own protection. The trucking companies are liable to the shipper if goods are lost or damaged due to any reason that is not excluded in their transportation contract.

 

Not all motor truck cargo insurance policies are the same, but they do share similarities. The Owners Form of the motor cargo policy is similar to the transportation policy, except that it is designed to protect the shipper who owns and operates their own fleet. The policy will use wording similar to merchandise is insured only while in the custody of the insured and actually in transit and only while contained in or on the following described motor truck and/or trucks that are owned and operated by the insured.

 

Typically, covered perils include:

 

         Fire, including self-ignition and internal explosion of the conveyance, and lightning

         Flood

         Cyclone and tornado

         Perils of the sea, lakes, rivers, and/or inland waters while on ferries only

         Collapse of bridges, and

         Accidental collision, including overturning of the vehicles.

 

Theft coverage is often added to this list, although it is usually limited to theft of either an entire shipping package or the entire load. All goods must be valued prior to shipment. The amount of insurance is, therefore, specific to each trucks goods.

 

Not every type of loss or merchandise is insurable. Motor truck cargo insurance excludes such things as:

 

         Accounts, bills, currency, deeds, and similar items

         Property located in or on the premises of the insured, or in any garage or other building where the described trucks are usually kept

         Loss due to delay, wet, dampness, spotting, and so forth

         Loss due to strikers, locked-out workers, riot, civil commotion, and so forth

         Loss or damage to livestock, except in the event of death caused or made necessary by the enumerated perils in the policy

         Loss or damage due to war.

 

 

Public truckers legal liability forms

The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) that governs motor carriers engaged in interstate commerce requires public truckers to obtain legal liability coverage before certificates of convenience and necessity for engaging in motor trucking will be issued. Many states also require cargo endorsements to be attached to policies of carriers operating within or passing through their borders. As a result, this type of insurance is a necessity for most trucking companies.

 

Each policy issued will have a stated maximum of liability coverage for each truck.

 

Means of communication coverage

The Nationwide Marine Definition identifies bridges, tunnels, piers, pipelines, power transmission lines, and radio and TV towers, including the equipment. Although these items are stationary, they are still involved in the moving of goods and people. Since coverage for such items must be so broad, only the inland marine underwriter was equipped to issue the protection. It has only been recently that fire underwriters have started to insure these types of items against the perils that affect them: collapse, flood, ice, earthquake, and collision. Inland marine underwriters had established their place in writing all-risk coverage for bridges and tunnels as well as aids to navigation, transportation, and communication as early as 1935. As time went by, inland marine underwriters added other insured items, such as power lines and communication equipment. This topic could be expanded into a course itself, so much has happened in recent years under the heading of communication.

 

Many of the items covered do not have a standard form. Each policy is written to fit the situation.



[1] Development of Inland Marine Insurance, P. 217

[2] Property and Liability Insurance by Huebner, Black & Webb, P. 220

[3] Inland Marine Risks and Coverages, P. 229

[4] Property and Liability Insurance by Huebner, Black & Webb